M.SUSHIL KUMAR,K G F vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(2)(1), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee filed an application to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the penalty levied under Section 271AAA. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI A. K. GARODIA
O R D E R
Per A. K. Garodia, Accountant Member:
This appeal is filed by the assessee and the same is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-4, Bengaluru, dated 26.04.2017, for Assessment Year 2012-13.
In this appeal, the assessee has raised various grounds but the only issue raised by the assessee is regarding levy of penalty of Rs.5,80,568/- under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter called ‘the Act’).
In the course of hearing, it is seen that on 25.08.2020, the assessee has filed a letter in which it is stated that the assessee has opted to file an application under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the necessary Form Nos. 1 and 2 under the said Act were filed on 20.05.2020. It is also stated in the Page 2 of 2 said application that under section 5(1) of the said Act, the pending appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn on the issue of Form 3 by the designated authority and the assessee has received form 3 dated 11.08.2020 and after receipt of form 3, the assessee has filed a letter before the Tribunal on 13.08.2020 in which it is stated by the assessee that the assessee intends to withdraw the application filed by the assessee. It is stated by the assessee in the present application that the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned DR of the Revenue had no objection for withdrawal of the appeal.
3. The assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal and the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 271AAA
- Rosy Blue (India) Private Limited, Mumbai vs Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central…ITA 3351/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2401/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2400/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2399/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2398/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026