M/S. IDATA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 16(2), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2600/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 September 2020AY 2011-123 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals as withdrawn, granting liberty to seek recall of the order if the assessee decides not to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee sought an adjournment to avail the benefit of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The Tribunal noted that opting for the scheme requires withdrawal of appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn to allow the assessee to pursue settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 254(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI A. K. GARODIA & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CA
For Respondent: Shri. Priyadarshi Mishra, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Hearing: 07.09.2020Pronounced: 11.09.2020

O R D E R

Per A. K. Garodia, Accountant Member:

1.

Both these appeals are filed by the assessee and are directed against two separate orders of learned CIT(A). One such order is dated 30.09.2019 passed by CIT(A) – 3 Bengaluru and in this appeal, the issue involved is in respect of Assessment Order passed by the AO under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter called ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2011- 12 and second order is of CIT(A) – 13 Bengaluru and it is dated 14.11.2019 for the same Assessment Year but in this case, the dispute is regarding the order passed by the AO under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act on 13.01.2014.

Page 2 of 3 2. Both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by way of this common order for the sake of convenience.

3.

Learned AR of the assessee has moved an application seeking adjournment of the hearing of these two appeals and in this application for adjournment dated 04.09.2020, it is stated by learned AR of the assessee that the assessee would like to avail the benefit of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and requested for adjournment of hearing of these two appeals. In the course of hearing, it was pointed out by the Bench that if the assessee intends to get the issue settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, then the assessee has to withdraw these two appeals and therefore, under such circumstances, this Bench is taking a consistent view that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the assessee to approach this Tribunal for recall of the Tribunal order under section 254(2) of the Act in case, the assessee finally decides not to opt for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. In reply, it was submitted by learned AR of the assessee that if such liberty is granted to the assessee then she has no objection for such dismissal of these appeals as withdrawn. Learned DR of the Revenue also agreed to this proposition put forward by the Bench.

4.

In view of the above discussion, we dismiss these two appeals of the assessee as withdrawn and liberty is granted to the assessee to approach this Tribunal for recall of this Tribunal order under section 254(2) of the Act in case the assessee finally decides not to settle the issues involved in these two appeals under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

Page 3 of 3 5. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed.

Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.

More judgments on Section 201(1)

All 3,835 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →