RAM AVTAR SINGHAL,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD59(3), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals for assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn upon the assessee's request due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER G.S. PANNU, VP :
These appeals by the assessee for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2004-05 are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-37, New Delhi, dated
2017. 2. The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter, received
through email, dated 23.04.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeals
filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed in all the appeals.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeals.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was pronounced in the open Court in the presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 30th April, 2021. (KUL BHARAT) VICE PRESIDENT f{x~{tÜ
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026