M/S. SHREE HATKESHWARA CARGO MOVERS,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 5, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) was vitiated because it did not strike off the inapplicable limb (concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars). Following the Bombay High Court's judgment, the penalty was directed to be deleted.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee offered a sum towards inadmissible expenses and filed a revised return including this amount. The AO imposed a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for this addition.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is sustainable when the notice issued under Section 274 does not specify the exact charge by striking off the inapplicable limb.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 271(1)(c),Section 274,Section 133A,Section 147,Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Mr. Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. ACIT672 citing125 Taxmann.com 253 · 2021 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. Golden Peace Hotels and Resorts (P) Ltd.105 citing124 Taxmann.com 249 · 2021 · SC
- Pr.CIT v. Golden Peace Hotels and Resorts (P.) Ltd.32 citing124 Taxmann.com 248 · 2021 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘A’ PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent; 3. The CIT(A), Pune-10 4. The PCIT-3, Pune 5. DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. 6.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1. Draft dictated on 11-01-2022 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 11-01-2022 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before JM the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026