M/S SHIVALIK VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, RANGE-15, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. It was held that the rectification of the challan defect did not constitute a delay in filing the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought to withdraw its appeal before the ITAT because it had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal filing involved a minor error in the challan for tribunal fees which was rectified later.
What were the issues?
Whether the rectification of a challan defect for tribunal fees constitutes a delay in filing an appeal. Whether the assessee can withdraw its appeal after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri Sanjay Garg
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA (Virtual Court) (Before Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member & Sri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member) Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. Shivalik Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd....………………..…..........................................................Appellant [PAN: AAICS 1948 C] Vs. ACIT, Range-15, Kolkata...............................................................................................Respondent Appearances by: Sh. Akkal Dudhwewala, FCA, appeared on behalf of the Assessee. Sh. Jayanta Khanra, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : February 5th, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : February 19th, 2021 ORDER Per Bench:
The assessee vide its application seeks permission to withdraw the impugned appeal for the reason that, it has opted for the scheme under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.
After hearing rival contentions, we find that the assessee has filed its appeal before the Tribunal on 25.11.2019 through speed post. There was an error in payment of Tribunal fees. The assessee had paid Tribunal fees by challan dated 16.11.2019 under minor head 400 instead of minor head 300. This was pointed out to the assessee by the Registry vide its letter dated 27.11.2019. The assessee got the same rectified from the Department and time taken for such rectification resulted in the delay. The assessee pleads that the Department had taken substantial time for rectifying the challan as the officers were not functioning due to COVID-19 pandemic. We are convinced with the submissions of the assessee.
This appeal has been filed well within the limitation period specified in the Act. There is no delay which has to be condoned by the Tribunal. Rectification of a defect in Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. Shivalik Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. the challans for payment of Tribunal fees cannot be considered as delay in filing of the appeal. We accept the letter of the assessee requesting permission for withdrawal of the appeal and dismiss this appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Kolkata, the 19th February, 2021. Sd/- Sd/- [Sanjay Garg] [J. Sudhakar Reddy] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 19.02.2021 Bidhan (P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to:
1. 1. M/s. Shivalik Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd., Beliadabga, Dakshin Barasat, Joy Nagar, South 24 Parganas, Kolkata-743 337.
2. ACIT, Range-15, Kolkata.
3. CIT(A)-5, Kolkata. (sent through mail) 4. CIT- 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata. (sent through mail)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhat Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 4 Nov 2026
- Siddharth Barai (Prop- Siddharth Design Studio) vs. The Superintendent CGST And Central Excise, Balangir RangeOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Shashibhusan Moharana vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, DhenkanalOrissa · 4 Nov 2026
- Paramount Tea Marketing PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 4 Nov 2026
- Md. Junaid vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 4 Nov 2026