RAJ KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-36(1), KOLKATA

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA (Before Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member & Sri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member) Assessment Year: 2015-16 Raj Kumar Agarwal....………………..…..............................................................................Appellant [PAN: ACTPA 5283 G] Vs. ITO, Ward-36(1), Kolkata............................................................................................Respondent Assessment Year: 2015-16 Raj Kumar Agarwal, HUF....………………..…....................................................................Appellant [PAN: AAEHR 1720 E] Vs. ITO, Ward-36(1), Kolkata............................................................................................Respondent Appearances by: None appeared on behalf of the Assessee. Sh. Jayanta Khanra, JCIT, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : February 12th, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : March 24th, 2021 ORDER Per Bench:

The assessees seek permission of this Bench to withdraw their appeals in & 1956/Kol/2019 as they have availed the scheme under “Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020” vide their applications dated 09.02.2021. The assessees state that they have been granted certificate by the designated authority in Form No.-3 under the provisions of “Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020”.