DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 5(2)(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S. NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the Revenue's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Revenue's appeal was filed primarily to keep the issues alive, as the CIT(A) had followed established precedents. The CIT(A) had allowed the assessee's claim for amortization of premium.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which allowed the assessee's claim for amortization of premium. The CIT(A) had relied on previous decisions in the assessee's own case and High Court rulings.
What were the issues?
The key issue was the allowability of amortization of premium claimed by the assessee, which the CIT(A) had allowed based on prior judicial pronouncements.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- 33 SOT 7 (Bang- Trib), DCIT Vs Karur Vysya Bank (2005) 273 ITR 510 ( Madras), CIT v. Nedungadi Bank Ltd.63 citing356 ITR 549 · 2013 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI. B. R. BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal has been filed by revenue against order dated 28/03/2019 passed by Ld.CIT(A)-5, Bangalore for assessment year 2011-12 on following grounds of appeal:
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026