BISHNU KUMAR JALAN,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-3(3), PURULIA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal due to the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme application. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee subsequently filed an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal in light of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP
आदेश / ORDER This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Asansol, dated 21-06-2019 for assessment year 2015-16.
On perusal of the letter filed by the assessee, I note that the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal in view of having filed application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme proof of which in the form of certificate issued by the competent authority in Form No. 3 is submitted before this Tribunal.
The ld. DR has no objection for allowing the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the request made by the assessee, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26th March, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026