SRIMATHI SUDARSANAM,NAGAPATTINAM vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 19(3), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessee can approach the Tribunal again if any injustice arises from the scheme's settlement.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020, and Form No. 3 was issued for settlement of the tax dispute. The assessee then requested permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be permitted to withdraw the appeal after opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ (SMC
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO
आदेश / O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13, Chennai in dated 14.03.2018 relevant to the Assessment Year 2010 - 2011.
2 -: 2. When this appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the Assessee has submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. He has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Assessee.
We have heard both the sides through Video-Conferencing, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
In this case, the Assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, he prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the submissions of the Assessee, the appeal filed by the Assessee is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate
3 -: application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 17th December, 2020 in Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026