INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(1)(3), BANGALORE vs. M/S HAMARA SHELTERS PVT LTD, BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 232/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 March 2020AY 2015-162 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The ITAT held that in view of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, the revenue cannot file appeals before the Tribunal where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against an order of the CIT(Appeals). The tax effect in this appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.

What were the issues?

Maintainability of revenue's appeal before the ITAT due to low tax effect as per CBDT circular.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

N/A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI B R BASKARAN

For Appellant: Shri Priyadarshini Mishra, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Hearing: 27.02.2020Pronounced: 18.03.2020

Per N.V. Vasudevan, Vice President

1.

This appeal is by the revenue against the order dated 02.11.2018 of the CIT(Appeals)-3, Bangalore for the assessment year 2015-16.

2.

Admittedly, the tax effect in this appeal by the revenue is less than Rs.50 lakhs. In view of the CBDT in Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019, the revenue cannot file appeals before the Tribunal where the tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Since the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, this appeal of the revenue is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed.

3.

In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed.

Pronounced in the open court on this 18th day of March, 2020.

Sd/- Sd/-

( B R BASKARAN ) ( N V VASUDEVAN ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT Bangalore, Dated, the 18th March, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →