S.K. GOLD CHAIN CO. PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had adjudicated the appeals on merits, considering all facts, legal provisions, and judicial pronouncements. Therefore, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s orders.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The appeals were adjudicated ex-parte as the assessee did not attend. The CIT(A) had previously adjudicated on issues including additions under Section 68, payments to ROC, and Section 50C.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained cash credits (Section 68), payments to ROC, and deemed income under Section 50C were correctly adjudicated by the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 50C,Section 37(1),Section 69,Section 56(1)(vii)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ORDER
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
Both the appeals viz. in for the A.Y. 2011-12 of ld. CIT (A)-22, New Delhi dated 05.01.2017 and in ITA No. 2983/Del/2017 for the A.Y. 2012-13 of ld. CIT (A)- 17, New Delhi dated 01.12.2016.
None attended on behalf of the assessee. & 2983/Del/2017 2 S K Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd.
At the outset, it was brought to our notice that the appeals have been adjudicated ex-parte. We have gone through the record before us and find that in the appeal before the ld. CIT (A) four grounds have been pleaded by the assessee in the grounds of appeal. The issues are (a) addition u/s 68 of the Act (b) addition on account of payment to ROC (c) addition on account of invocation of Section 50C of the Act.
The ld. CIT (A) has fairly adjudicated on the issue of addition on account of payment to ROC on going through the Section 37(1) of the IT Act. Further, the addition on account of 50C of the Act has been adjudicated based on the provisions of Section 69, Section 56(1)(vii)(b) of the Act. On account of addition u/s 68 of the Act, the ld. CIT (A) after duly considering the written submission made by the assessee has adjudicated the issue relying on the order of ITAT Ahmadabad dated 18.08.2015 in the case of Nakoda Fashion Pvt. Ltd. in for the assessment year 2009-10. Similarly, for the ITA No.2983/Del/2017 for the assessment year 2012-13, the ld. CIT (A)-17 vide order dated 19.05.2015 has also adjudicated the matter on merits giving due reasons for adjudication. Since, we find that the appeal has been adjudicated on merits taking into consideration all the facts, provisions of the Act and the judicial pronouncement and on going through the record, we find no reason to interfere with the order of the ld. CIT (A). The appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed. & 2983/Del/2017 3 S K Gold Chain Co. Pvt. Ltd.
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 29/08/2019).
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026