DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. WEL INTERTRADE PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable as the tax effect was less than the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 50 lacs. The Revenue could not provide any exceptions to the circular.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 mandates that appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50 lacs should not be filed.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable given the tax effect and the CBDT's circular on monetary limits for filing appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Amit Shukla, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member Asstt. Year : 2010-11 DCIT, Vs Wel Intertrade Pvt. Ltd., Circle-27(2), 5-E, Local Shopping Centre, New Delhi Masjid Moth, GK-II, New Delhi-110025 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACW0187F Assessee by : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 28.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 29.08.2019 ORDER Per Amit Shukla, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-22, New Delhi dated 17.05.2016.
According to Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the CBDT in supersession of earlier instructions has directed that department’s appeals before ITAT shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 50 lacs. The tax will not include any interest thereon. It is further clarified that even if in the case of an assessee, disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal cannot be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit so specified.
2 Wel Intertrade Pvt. Ltd. 3. Admittedly, in the departmental appeal, the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lacs, therefore, departmental appeal is not maintainable. The Ld. DR could not bring to our notice any exceptions mentioned in the said Circular.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 29/08/2019).
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026