DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), NEW DELHI vs. A.D. TEXTILES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CBDT circular revised the monetary limit for appeals to Rs. 50 Lacs and applied it to pending appeals. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. The Revenue's counsel stated that the appeal was to be withdrawn due to a low tax effect, below the revised monetary limit set by CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable given the revised monetary limits for appeals set by the CBDT and the low tax effect involved.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI
Before: MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA & SHRI B.R.R.KUMAR
आदेश / ORDER आदेश आदेश आदेश PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM: The appeal filed by Revenue is against order of CIT(A)-32, New Delhi, dated 06.03.2018 relating to assessment year 2014-15 against the order passed under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
ITA No:4528/Del/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 2. Despite service of notice, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, Ld. DR for the Revenue pointed out that the present appeal is to be withdrawn as the tax effect involved in the case is below Rs.50 Lacs.
The CBDT vide Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeals before the Tribunal to Rs.50 Lacs. Further, CBDT vide letter dated 20.08.2019 has also clarified that Circular No.17/2019 would be applicable to all pending appeals. In such circumstances, the present appeal filed by the Revenue in case of low tax effect is not maintainable.
Before parting, we clarify here that the Revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution of appeal, if the requisite material is brought to show that the appeal is protected by the exceptions prescribed in para 10 of the Circular dated 11.07.2018.
In conclusion, by applying the CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019 and letter dated 20.08.2019 (supra), the captioned appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed.
In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 01st day of October, 2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026