SHRIRAM NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA LTD,SATARA vs. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, SATARA, SATARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(Appeals)'s ex-parte order and remitted the matter back for a fresh adjudication on merits. The assessee was granted one final opportunity to present their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(Appeals) despite multiple opportunities, leading to an ex-parte order. The CIT(Appeals) decided the case based on available documents without a detailed adjudication on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(Appeals) without adjudicating on merits is sustainable. Whether principles of natural justice require a final opportunity for the assessee to present their case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, PUNE
ORDER
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 4, Pune, dated 28-01-2019 for A.Y. 2007-08 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
Despite service of notice, none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor is any application for adjournment filed by the assessee.
We have heard Ld. DR and perused the material available on record. We find that the Ld.CIT(Appeals) has passed an ex-parte order and the rights and liabilities of the parties herein were not adjudicated on merits. That on perusal of Para 5 of the CIT(Appeals)’s order, it is apparent that several opportunities were provided to the assessee asking him to attend the hearing. However, the assessee had remained absent.
Shriram Nagari Sah. Pat Sansthas A.Y. 2007-08
That further it is evident from Para 5.5 to 5.5 of the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) that he has decided the appeal on the basis of documents available on record. The process of judicial adjudication requires Sub-ordinate Appellate Authority to adjudicate the case on merits and come out with a speaking order. In the present case, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) was unable to do so because of the evasive nature of the assessee. However, keeping in mind the principles of natural justice and the very fact, the Income Tax Act is welfare legislation; we are of the considered view that one final opportunity should be given to the assessee to present his case on merits. Therefore, the assessee is directed to present himself or through his authorised representative before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) immediately on receipt of this order along with relevant/ necessary documents to present his case on merits before the Ld. CIT(Appeals) and he shall adjudicate the same by passing a speaking order while complying with the principles of natural justice. In view of the aforesaid directions, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) and remit the matter back to his file. Any issuance of notice is dispensed with.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 11th day of May 2022
Sd/- sd/- (R.S. SYAL) (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune; Dated, the 11th day of May 2022 Ankam
Shriram Nagari Sah. Pat Sansthas A.Y. 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026