CELIAC SOCIETY OF INDIA,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(Exemption)'s finding that sponsorship income automatically made the activities non-genuine. It held that the objects of the society were charitable and the receipt of sponsorship, even with TDS, did not negate the genuineness of the activities.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society with objects of creating awareness about celiac disease, applied for registration under Section 12A and recognition under Section 80G. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application, holding that the genuineness of charitable activities could not be established due to a high proportion of sponsorship income.
What were the issues?
Whether the receipt of sponsorship income, with TDS deducted by donors, renders the charitable activities of a society non-genuine for the purpose of registration under Section 12A. Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the application for registration based solely on the proportion of sponsorship income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 80G,Section 2(15),Section 12AA,Section 11,Section 194J
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “ Friday Bench”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI H.S.SIDHU & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.
Today, this matter was fixed as assessee has filed a petition for early hearing of the matter in 12 A of the Income Tax Act was not granted to the assessee trust.
The assessee at the time of hearing sought adjournment stating that authorised representative of the appellant is suffering from high viral fever and he will not be able to prepare the present case before the coordinate bench. The assessee also submitted the copy of the doctor’s prescription. However, looking at the matter we thought it not fit to grant the request of the assessee for adjournment and we proceed to decide the appeal itself as per request of the learned Departmental Representative.
The brief fact of the case is that assessee is a society, which is registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 in the state of Delhi as per Registration Certificate dated 12/10/2018. The assessee is specifically having the object of to create awareness about celiac disease Page | 1 and related condition and to represent the needs of celiac disease at national level. The assessee preferred an application in Form No. 10A on 5/12/2018 and further on 11/12/2018 in Form No. 10G before the CIT (Exemption), Delhi for granting the registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act and recognition u/s 80G of the Act. Attending the above application the learned CIT(Exemption) issued letter dated 13/10/2018 requesting assessee to submit certain documents in support of its claim for registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act. On perusal of the detail, he found that applicant has shown the income from subscription received from member, event revenue and sponsorship received on which tax deduction at source u/s 194 and 194C has been made. Therefore, he issued a specific show cause notice on 24/06/2019 to justify the professional fees received from the different parties on which the TDS is deducted. The assessee was also asked to furnish confirmation of the parties. He noted that assessee has received a total sponsorship amount of Rs. 2490000/- out of the total receipts of Rs. 2750500/- in Financial Year 2018-19 which constitutes more than 90% of the total receipt and therefore he held that sponsorship which was never voluntarily. Therefore, he held that the genuineness of the charitable activities cannot be established and therefore the condition for granting registration u/s 12AA is not satisfied. Accordingly, he rejected the application. Consequently he passed an order u/s 12AA (1) (b) read with section 12A and 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act on 28/06/2019. Therefore, the assessee is aggrieved and has preferred this appeal.
The Ld AR refereed to the statements of facts filed along with the appeal and mentioned the object of the trust and event in which sponsorship was received. He submitted that activities of the assessee are charitable u/s 2(15) of the Act and they are genuine.
The learned Departmental Representative vehemently submitted that assessee is carrying on the activity, which was found to be non-genuine by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi, and therefore the application has been rejected.
We have carefully considered the grounds of appeal
as well as the statement of facts raised by the assessee along with these appeals. Rival contentions were perused. The assessee has submitted that it has shown income from subscription received from the members and the event revenue and sponsorship income received by the assessee. It was further stated that in the month of January 2019 assessee has organized a symposium on 11 – 12/01/2019 wherein an amount of Rs 46,50,000/- were incurred which were contributed by various sponsors and others. Some of the sponsors who made their contribution have applied the provisions of section 194J of the act on payment to the assessee. It is claimed that assessee has received this money and applied for the charitable purposes u/s 2. (15) read with section 11 of The Income Tax Act. Merely because the donors of the assessee, sponsoring the event have deducted tax at source on sponsorship amount, it does not make the activities of the assessee non-genuine. In fact, the objects of the society are charitable in nature as they are specifically for creating an awareness about celiac disease and related conditions and to represent the needs of such awareness on a national level. Therefore, looking at the object of the trust, we do not find any reason to hold that it is not charitable in nature and not covered u/s 2. (15) of the act . With respect to the activities of the assessee, it has explained in detail that it has organized a symposium and from which some sponsorships were received on which the tax has been deducted by the donors or contributors. However, this does not show that the activities carried out by the assessee are not genuine. The learned CIT(E) has held that genuineness of the charitable activities cannot be established and therefore the condition for granting registration u/s 12. AA is not satisfied. We are not in agreement with the finding of the learned CIT(E) merely because the assessee has organized certain events which were sponsored by the various persons who have deducted tax at source on such sponsorship revenue, it cannot make the activities of the assessee non genuine. Further the finding of the learned CIT – A that total sponsorship amount of Rs 24.90,000/- out of the total receipt of Rs. 27,50,500/- has been Page | 3
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026