ITO-12(1)(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S. BELLOR HOMES AND REALTORS PVT. LTD., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, following the Madras High Court's decision. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration of the appeals if their declaration under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' was not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee had filed appeals before the ITAT. At the time of hearing, the assessee's counsel submitted that the assessee had filed a declaration under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle the disputes.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as the assessee has opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' to settle tax disputes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, AM & SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JM & & &
आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH:
These cross appeals in for A.Y.2015-16 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)- 20/IT-10223/2017-18 dated 11/01/2018 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 29/12/2017 by the ld. Income Tax Officer, 12(1)(3), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee Shri Vimal Punmiya submitted that assessee had already filed a declaration under ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme to settle the disputes arising out of these appeals. This is considered as a statement made from the Bar.
We have heard rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. Since, the assessee had already filed an application under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme Act 2020”, there is no need to keep these appeals pending before us in view of the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A. No.372 of 2020 dated 16.10.2020, wherein the Hon‟ble High Court after considering the intention of the assessee to avail the benefit of „Vivad se Vishwas Scheme-2020‟ (VSV scheme), had dismissed the appeal by observing in Para 7 to 9 as under:- “7. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is 628/Mum/2019 M/s. Bellor Homes and Realtors Pvt. Ltd., made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.
In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file the Form No.I on or before 20.11.2020 and the competent authority shall process the application/ declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form.
With this declaration, the Tax Case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently the Substantial Question of Law are left upon. No costs.”
In the light of the view taken by Hon‟ble Madras High Court cited (supra), we also give liberty to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that the assessee does not succeed on the declaration filed by the assessee under direct tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020”. In other words if the assessee‟s declaration to be filed is not accepted by the Revenue for any reason whatsoever, the assessee can make a prayer before the Bench for recalling of the order by filing a miscellaneous application for restoration of appeal. The Registry will place such petition before the Bench concerned.
In view of the aforesaid observations, we dismiss these cross appeals with a liberty to get them recalled in the eventuality of assessee‟s declaration not getting accepted by the Revenue.
628/Mum/2019 M/s. Bellor Homes and Realtors Pvt. Ltd.,
In the result, the appeal of the assessee as well as that of the revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced on 24/11/2020 in the open Court.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026