Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALESmt. Mangal M. Gaitonde
सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of Hearing 01/12/2020 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement 02/12/2020 आदेश / O R D E R
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE - JM:
The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -3, Thane, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
At the time hearing, the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee is intended to settle the Smt. Mangal M. Gaitonde, Mumbai. - 2 - tax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’. Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections.
3 .We heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and the assessee would be moving an application for the scheme as envisaged by the Ld. AR. We are of the view that, the no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn and the assessee is given liberty to move an application u/s 254(2) of the Act to recall the present order in accordance with the provisions of law.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 02.12.2020