M/S. MAHARASHTRA ERECTORS PVT.LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 9, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw both appeals. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed two appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11. The assessee subsequently decided not to pursue these appeals and sought permission to withdraw them.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's request for withdrawal of appeals should be granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B”
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
ORDER PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: These two appeals filed by the Assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-6, Pune for the A.Y. 2009-10 & 2010-11, passed under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter also called as “the Act”] dated 16.02.2018 & 12.02.2018 respectively.
These two appeals came up for hearing on 7th June, 2022. 2. The assessee submitted separate letters both dated 13.06.2022 and submitted that the assessee company has decided not to pursue both appeals under consideration and further sought permission for withdrawal of both the appeals.
& 1064/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2009-10 & 10-11 M/s.Maharashtra Erectors Pvt. Ltd., vs. Dy.CIT, Circle-9, Pune [A]
The ld.Departmental Representative [ld.DR] appearing for the Revenue has no objection if both the appeals of assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
We allow the assessee to withdraw both the appeals.
In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 11th July, 2022.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026