BIPASHA SAHANA,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(4), HOOGHLY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and received Form No. 3. This withdrawal is subject to the assessee completing the scheme process.
What were the facts?
The assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and had filed the necessary forms. The Competent Authority had issued Form No. 3 to the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and received the relevant form.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld.CIT(A)-6, Kolkata dated 30.07.2019.
None appeared for the appellant. At the outset, it is noticed from the letter of the assessee dated 23.08.2021 that the assessee had opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form-1, Form-2 before the Competent Authority and pursuant to which the assessee had received Form No. 3 from the Competent Authority. Therefore, taking into consideration the fact that since the assessee has opted for the Scheme and is in receipt of Form no. 3, there is no point in keeping the impugned appeal pending.
In the light of the aforesaid discussion, I treat this submission of the assessee informing the Tribunal the fact that assessee has opted for the said scheme and is in receipt of Form no. 3, therefore, I allow the assessee to withdraw the captioned appeal. In case, if in any case the assessee is not able to complete the process envisaged in the Bipisha Sahana. A.Y. 2015-16 Scheme, then the assessee is at liberty to move an application for recalling this order. With the aforesaid caveat, I allow the assessee to withdraw the captioned appeal.
Needless to say that the aforesaid action allowing the assessee to withdraw the appeal, will not come in the way of the competent authority of Revenue to accept the assssee’s said option/scheme for availing “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” provided the assessee remits the tax due as per Form no. 3 of the Scheme.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 24th August, 2021
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026