HARPREET SINGH ANAND,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, COIMBATORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1250/CHNY/2017Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 May 2021AY 2009-103 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme. The assessees were also informed that they could approach the Tribunal if any injustice arose from the scheme's settlement.

What were the facts?

The assessees had filed appeals before the ITAT. During the pendency of these appeals, they opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020, and Form No. 3 was issued for settlement of their tax disputes.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessees opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA

Consolidated Appeals (2)

ITA 1251/Chny/2017AY 2011-12
ITA 1830/Chny/2019AY 2012-13
Hearing: 22.04.2021Pronounced: 05.05.2021

आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH:

1.

These three appeals filed by different assessees are directed against the orders of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore & Chennai even dated 31.03.2017 & 30.11.2017 for respective assessment years.

2.

The appeal filed by the assessee in is delayed by 491 days, for which, the assessee has filed an affidavit for condonation of the delay, to which, the ld. DR has not raised any serious objection. Consequently, since the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause, the delay of 491 days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication.

3.

When these appeals were taken up for hearing, vide letters dated 22.04.2021 & 13.04.2021 the learned counsels for the assessees have submitted that the assessees have opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued in all the appeals. The Ld. counsels for the assessees have also submitted that they may be permitted to withdraw the appeals.

4.

On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the assessees.

5.

We have heard the counsels for the assessees through video conferencing, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.

6.

In these cases, the assessees have opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the & 1251 /Chny/2017 & 1830/Chny/2019 3 settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, the assessees have prayed that they may be permitted to withdraw the appeals.

7.

In view of the submissions of the assessees, the appeals filed by the assessees are permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the assessees to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the assessees in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →