PREITY DURGANAND ZINTA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIT CC 2 (3), MUMBAI

ITA 7009/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 November 2020AY 2013-142 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that once a matter is resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee later filed a withdrawal letter stating the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal can be withdrawn if the underlying dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘C’ BENCH, MUMBAI

O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, VP:

The assessee has moved petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the matter is settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.

Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee.

There is no dispute that once the matter is resolved under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn.

Page 2 of 2 4. In view of the above position, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →