SRI. MAHALINGAM SUBBIAN,BANGALORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 5(3)(7), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and would likely withdraw the appeal. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, as keeping it pending would serve no purpose.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c). The assessee's representative sought an adjournment, stating that the assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and was awaiting a certificate. The revenue representative submitted that the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for a dispute resolution scheme and intends to withdraw the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B. R. BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 28-05-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-5, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2014-15. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming the penalty levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the Ld A.R has moved an adjournment petition mentioning therein that the assessee has filed applications under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and is waiting for the certificate in Form No.3 from Sri Mahalingam Subbian, Bangalore the Pr. CIT. Accordingly the Ld A.R has sought for adjournment of the matter.
The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.
We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
We notice that the A.R of the assessee has stated in the adjournment letter that the assessee has not received Form no.3, in which the tax amount to be paid by the assessee shall be intimated by the department. Hence, it appears that the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
Sri Mahalingam Subbian, Bangalore Page 3 of 3
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open Court on 14-08-2020
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026