SANDEEP PANDURANG SAKHARE,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (4), PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed was a duplicate of an already withdrawn appeal. Therefore, it was dismissed on this ground.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a duplicate appeal before the ITAT. The original appeal on the same matter was withdrawn by the assessee as they had availed the benefit of the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether a duplicate appeal, which is identical to an appeal already withdrawn under a tax settlement scheme, should be entertained.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B”
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This appeal in is a Duplicate Appeal. The assessee has already filed Appeal No.965/PUN/2019 against the ld.CIT(A) order dated 05.03.2019 emanating from Assessing Officer’s order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act dated 23.03.2016. The said Appeal No.965/PUN/2019 has been withdrawn by the assessee as assessee has availed benefit of direct tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme-2020 for the impugned year. Since the said appeal i.e.ITA No.1616/PUN/2019 is also against the ld.CIT(A)’s order dated 05.03.2019 arising out of assessment order under section 143 r.w.s 147 of the Act dated 23.03.2016, it is dismissed as duplicate appeal.
A.Y. 2008-09 Sandeep Pandurang Sakhare Vs. ITO, Ward-2(4), Pune [A]
On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative (DR) submits that he has no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 22nd July, 2022.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026