V.T.KUMARAVEL,KARUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 11, TRICHY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had obtained Form No. 3 under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and sought withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12. The assessee wished to utilize the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' to settle the dispute.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश/ O R D E R PER BENCH:
The assessee filed these appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 19, Chennai in dated 09.05.2017 for the assessment years 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12, respectively.
:- 2 -: 1856 to 1859/Chny/2017
The above cases were heard through video conferencing. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the assessee invited our attention to the letters dated 04.05.2021 and submitted that the assessee wanted to utilize the Direct Taxes ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ to settle pending dispute relating to Direct Taxes and in this regard the assessee has filed Form No. 1 and Form 2 and obtained Form No. 3 from the designated authority.
The Bench has considered the material. Since the assessee submits that he has obtained Form No.3 and seeks withdrawal of appeals, therefore, we dismiss the appeals filed by the assessee, supra, as withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the assessee to restore the appeals, in the event if the designated authority, for any reason reject the application filed by the assessee under section 4 of the said Act.
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 30th June, 2021 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026