MANGALCHAND SUNIL KUMAR,K G F vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 4(2)(1), BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and received Form 3, indicating the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c). However, the appeal was withdrawn by the assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI A. K. GARODIA
O R D E R
Per A. K. Garodia, Accountant Member:
This appeal is filed by the assessee and the same is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-4, Bengaluru dated 04.07.2019, for Assessment Year 2012-13.
In this appeal, the assessee has raised various grounds but the only issue raised by the assessee is regarding levy of penalty of Rs.5,21,775/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter called ‘the Act’).
In the course of hearing, it is seen that on 25.08.2020, the assessee has filed a letter in which it is stated that the assessee has opted to file an application under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the necessary Form Nos. 1 and 2 under the said Act were filed on 20.05.2020. It is also stated in the Page 2 of 2 said application that under section 5(1) of the said Act, the pending appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn on the issue of Form 3 by the designated authority and the assessee has received form 3 dated 11.08.2020 and after receipt of form 3, the assessee has filed a letter before the Tribunal on 13.08.2020 in which it is stated by the assessee that the assessee intends to withdraw the appeal filed by the assessee. It is stated by the assessee in the present application that the present appeal may be dismissed s withdrawn. Learned DR of the Revenue had no objection for withdrawal of the appeal.
3. The assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal and the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026