SHRI SHARAD KUMAR SARAF,MUMBIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 25(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and submitted the necessary application. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently filed a petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal, stating that the matter has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal needs to be decided when the dispute is settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & SHRI M. BALAGANESH, AM
आदेश / O R D E R महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष के द्वारा / PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP: This appeal of assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)]-53, Mumbai [in short CIT(A)], dated 14.06.2019. The assessment was framed by the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (in short ACIT/ AO) for the A.Y. 2006-07
The assessee has moved petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the matter is settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.
The Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee.
We have heard the learned Departmental Representative Shri. T.S. Khalsa and also perused the letter of the assessee dated 07.12.2020. In the letter, the assessee has opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
We find that the assessee has enclosed the copy of application of Form No. 3 under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax ‘Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ filed before the competent authority. We noted that once the assessee has opted for ‘Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ and filed Form-3 under the ‘Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ with the competent authority and the competent authority has issued Form No.3, it is not necessary for the Tribunal to decide the above raised issue as the Govt. of India has enacted the direct tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme Act 2020 to provide for resolution of dispute mechanism in regard to direct tax disputes and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. In terms of the said Act, the assessee has been given an option to put an end to the tax disputes which may be pending at different levels including the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Under section 25 of the Direct Tax ‘Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026