M/S MASTURLAL PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4(1)(3), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and would be moving to withdraw the appeal. As no purpose would be served by keeping the appeal pending, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the hearing, the assessee's representative stated that the assessee had opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee requested the appeal be dismissed with liberty to move for recall if necessary.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appropriate course of action for an appeal pending before the Tribunal when the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ C ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI
O R D E R PER SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, A.M. : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Bangalore Dt.30.11.2017. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of ld. CIT (Appeals).
At the time of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that these assessee has opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Accordingly, ld. AR submitted that the appeal may be dismissed with the liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with law, if the assessee intended to do so.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing the Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. Ld. DR submitted that the Form No.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeals.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the assessee would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeals filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary application before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. Further the assessee is at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page. Sd/- Sd/- (N.V. VASUDEVAN) (CHANDRA POOJARI) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 10.09.2020. *Reddy GP
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Susanta Mohanty, Gandarpur, Cuttack vs. The Principal Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Arun Kumar Mallik vs. The Commissioner, CGST, Cx And Customs,BbsrOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Sabita Khosla vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Rayagada-Ii Range, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Karo Sambhav Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Pranshu Singhal vs. Additional/Joint Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 31 Oct 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026