KODIHALLI HANUMANTAIAH SETTY,BANGALORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, RAMANAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assesses were not interested in prosecuting the pending appeals due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assesses had filed appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. During the pendency of these appeals, the assesses opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the pending appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn in light of the assesses opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ C ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI
O R D E R PER SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, A.M. : These appeals filed by the assesses are directed against different orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) of Bangalore. The assesses are aggrieved by the decision of ld. CIT (Appeals). Since common issue is involved in these
At the time of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative submitted that these assesses have opted to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Accordingly, ld. AR submitted that these appeals may be dismissed with the liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with law, if the assesses intended to do so.
On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative submitted that the assesses have to withdraw the pending appeals after filing the Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Thereafter the assesses are required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. Ld. DR submitted that the Form No.3 shall be issued to the assesses in due course and accordingly he submitted that the appeals of the assesses may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assesses, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeals.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Since the assesses has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the assesses are interested in not prosecuting these appeals filed before the Tribunal. Since the assesses have already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping the 3 & 2649/Bang/2018 & 2634/Bang/2019 appeals pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals of the assesses as withdrawn. Further the assesses are at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assesses intends to do so. 5. In the result, all the appeals of the assesses are dismissed as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026