M/S MEGATHEM ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 272/KOL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 September 2021AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw its appeal as the respondent had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and completed the necessary formalities. The assessee then expressed a desire to withdraw its appeal before the tribunal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144C(1),Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri P. M. Jagtap, VP (KZ) & Shri A. T. Varkey]

Pronounced: 22.09.2021

Date of Hearing (Virtual) 22.09.2021 Date of Pronouncement 22.09.2021 For the Appellant Shri Vivek Churiwala, AR For the Respondent Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl. CIT ORDER

Per Shri A. T. Varkey, JM:

1.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of ACIT, circle-2(1), Kolkata dated 30-12-2019 for assessment years 2014-15 passed u/s. 144C(1)/263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2.

At the outset, Shri Vivek Churiwala, Learned Authorised Representative of the assessee brought to our notice that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form no. 1 and Form no. 2 before the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority had accepted it and had issued Form- 3. Thereafter the assessee has remitted the tax as per Form 3 and filed form no. 4 and is expecting Form 5 anytime from the competent authority. In the light of the above, the assessee expresses his desire to withdraw its appeal. Apropos the discussion (supra) and since Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl., CIT, Learned Departmental Representative does not have any objection in withdrawing the same, we allow the assessee to withdraw the impugned appeal. 3. In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (P. M. Jagtap) (A. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 22nd September, 2021 JD, Sr. PS Megathem Electronics Pvt. Ltd. AY: 2013-14 Copy of the order forwarded to:

1.

Appellant- M/s. Megathem Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Plot L-1, Block GP, Sector V, Electronics Complex, Salt Lake City, Kolkata0700 091.

2. Respondent – ACIT, circle-2(1), Kolkata 3. The CIT(A) , Kolkata 4. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail) True Copy By Order

Senior Private Secretary/DDO ITAT, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata

More judgments on Section 144C(1)

All 423 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →