M/S MEGATHEM ELECTRONICS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-2(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw its appeal as the respondent had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and completed the necessary formalities. The assessee then expressed a desire to withdraw its appeal before the tribunal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri P. M. Jagtap, VP (KZ) & Shri A. T. Varkey]
Date of Hearing (Virtual) 22.09.2021 Date of Pronouncement 22.09.2021 For the Appellant Shri Vivek Churiwala, AR For the Respondent Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl. CIT ORDER
Per Shri A. T. Varkey, JM:
1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of ACIT, circle-2(1), Kolkata dated 30-12-2019 for assessment years 2014-15 passed u/s. 144C(1)/263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
At the outset, Shri Vivek Churiwala, Learned Authorised Representative of the assessee brought to our notice that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form no. 1 and Form no. 2 before the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority had accepted it and had issued Form- 3. Thereafter the assessee has remitted the tax as per Form 3 and filed form no. 4 and is expecting Form 5 anytime from the competent authority. In the light of the above, the assessee expresses his desire to withdraw its appeal. Apropos the discussion (supra) and since Shri Supriyo Pal, Addl., CIT, Learned Departmental Representative does not have any objection in withdrawing the same, we allow the assessee to withdraw the impugned appeal. 3. In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (P. M. Jagtap) (A. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 22nd September, 2021 JD, Sr. PS Megathem Electronics Pvt. Ltd. AY: 2013-14 Copy of the order forwarded to:
Appellant- M/s. Megathem Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Plot L-1, Block GP, Sector V, Electronics Complex, Salt Lake City, Kolkata0700 091.
2. Respondent – ACIT, circle-2(1), Kolkata 3. The CIT(A) , Kolkata 4. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail) True Copy By Order
Senior Private Secretary/DDO ITAT, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata
More judgments on Section 144C(1)
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026