SMT. KANCHANA BAI CHORDIA,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 5 (1), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) correctly dismissed the appeal on grounds of both delay and non-maintainability, as the issues had already been decided.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an original assessment order after a significant delay. The issues raised in this appeal were already adjudicated in a previous appeal against a reassessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed belatedly with issues already adjudicated is maintainable. Whether the assessee can claim relief under Section 54 when it was not adjudicated in prior proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO,, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 5, Chennai, dated 05.12.2019 relevant to the assessment year 2010-11.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed her return of income for the assessment year 2010-11 on 31.03.2011 declaring total income of ₹.1,99,990/- and the same was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. Subsequently, the return was selected for scrutiny and after following due procedures, the Assessing Officer has completed the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act dated 26.03.2013 by assessing the total income of the assessee at ₹.44,10,951/- after making addition towards disallowance of deduction claimed under section 35(1)(iii) of the Act of ₹.2,50,000/- and addition towards long term capital gains tax. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee.
On being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. By relying upon the grounds of appeal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed for grant of relief under section 54 of the Act.
4. On the other hand, the ld. DR strongly supported the order passed by the ld. CIT(A).
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. In this case, the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 26.03.2013 by determining the total income of the assessee at ₹.44,10,950/-. In the appellate order, the ld. CIT(A) has noted that the assessment was reopened under section 147 of the Act and the reassessment was completed on ₹.51,89,118/-. 19.12.2017 determining total income at The said reassessment completed under section 147 of the Act dated 19.12.2017 was challenged before the ld. CIT(A), who on due consideration has dismissed the appeal. On further appeal, vide order in & 2681/Chny/2018 dated 14.08.2019, the Tribunal has allowed the appeal.
Thereafter, the assessee has also moved a miscellaneous petition before the ITAT with a prayer to consider the relief claimed under section 54, which hitherto not adjudicated in the order passed on 14.08.2019. Therefore, the issue of claim of relief under section 54 of the Act is pending before the ITAT by way of miscellaneous petition. Meanwhile, the assessee has filed another appeal against the original assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Act on 26.03.2013 before the ld. CIT(A) belatedly after a delay of 2002 days. However, the ld. CIT(A) has noted from the grounds taken and the issues raised are already adjudicated in the appeal filed against the order under section 147 of the Act passed on 19.12.2017 by the ld. CIT(A) vide his order dated 29.06.2018 and thereafter by ITAT in its order dated 14.08.2019. Therefore, the ld. CIT(A) was of the opinion that the assessee cannot agitate once again on the same issues, which are already adjudicated. Hence the appeal filed now before the ld. CIT(A) against the original assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act dated 26.03.2013 is not maintainable in law. Since the assessee has already filed MP before the ITAT for adjudication of relief claimed under section 54 of the Act, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal filed against the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act order dated 26.03.2013 on the grounds of both delay and non-maintainability.
Since the assessee has initially preferred an appeal against the reassessment order under section 147 of the Act dated 19.12.2017 against which, the assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) and the same was concluded by the ld. CIT(A) vide his order dated 29.06.2018, against which, the appeal filed before the ITAT has also been concluded vide Tribunal’s order in & 2681/Chny/2018. Since the assessee has again filed another appeal against the original assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act dated 26.03.2013 with a delay of 2002 days by raising the issues already adjudicated in the appeal filed against the order under section 147 of the Act, we are of the opinion that the ld. CIT(A) has correctly dismissed the appeal on both the counts of delay and non-maintainability of the appeal filed by the assessee. We find no reason to interfere with the order passed by the ld. CIT(A).
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced on the 05th May, 2022 in Chennai.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026