ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR vs. KALPANA KHATORIA , JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the department issued notices u/s 153C in compliance with the High Court's decision. Therefore, the appeals filed by the department were held to be not maintainable as the department had already given effect to the High Court's decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders which set aside assessment orders for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17. The CIT(A) had allowed the assessee's appeals on the grounds that assessment orders u/s 147 of the Act did not survive in view of a High Court decision quashing notices u/s 148.
What were the issues?
Whether the department's appeals are maintainable when they have already complied with the High Court's decision that rendered the original assessment orders ineffective.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 153C,Section 153A,Section 153D,Section 139,Section 149,Section 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Shyam Sunder Khandelwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax97 citing161 Taxmann.com 255 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B-Bench” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 946 & 947/JPR/2025
PER: Narinder Kumar, Judicial Member
Both the above captioned appeals are being disposed of vide this common order, as same issue in involved and arguments have been advanced in the appeals simultaneously.
Vide impugned orders dated 05.04.2025, Learned CIT(A) allowed two separate appeals filed by the assessee- respondent herein, relating to the Kalpana Khatori
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026