ENMAS GB POWER SYSTEMS P.LTD,CHENNAI vs. JCIT RANGE-1, TRICHY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal without considering the merits. The assessee was directed to furnish all relevant documents and explanations to the CIT(A), who was then instructed to adjudicate the appeal on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was assessed at a significantly higher amount than initially declared. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte due to non-representation.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without adjudicating on merits. The need for the assessee to provide proper documentation and representation before the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman
O R D E R
PER DUVVURUL RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 1, Trichy, dated 03.07.2019 relevant to the assessment year 2011-12. In the grounds of appeal, besides challenging various additions made in the assessment order, the assessee has also challenged the ex-parte order passed by the ld. CIT(A) by raising specific ground.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 on 03.03.2012 admitting total income of ₹.47,44,810/-. The return filed by the assessee was processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and against statutory notices, the assessee filed various details. On perusal of the details furnished by the assessee and considering various submissions made during the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act by assessing the total income of the assessee at ₹.3,12,83,550/- after making various additions. On appeal, since the assessee could not responded/ represented his case, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal.
On being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has erroneously dismissed the appeal summarily without going into the merits of the case. Thus, the ld. counsel prayed that suitable directions may kindly be issued to the ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate the issues on merits by giving an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. On the other hand, the ld. DR dutifully supported the orders of authorities below.
We have heard both the sides through video conferencing, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. On perusal of the appellate order, we find that the assessee has not made any efforts either to put his appearance or filed written submissions or proper explanation against various additions made in the assessment order with evidences, if any, to represent its case before the ld. CIT(A). Before the Tribunal, the assessee has challenged only the exparte order without raising any grounds on merits. No authority can decide an appeal upon the grounds of appeal of the assessee without any supporting evidence, etc. In view of the above, the assessee is directed to furnish all relevant documents with cogent evidence along with suitable explanation before the ld. CIT(A) and the ld. CIT(A) is directed to adjudicate the issues raised in the appeal of the assessee after affording an opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on the 29th October, 2020 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026