M/S. SHUBHAM DEVELOPERS PROMOTERS AND BUILDERS,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued under Section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) was vitiated because it did not strike off the irrelevant limb of the charge (concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars). Following the Bombay High Court's Full Bench decision, the penalty was deemed unsustainable.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee offered additional income of Rs. 10,86,800. The assessment was completed at the declared income, and subsequently, a penalty was imposed under Section 271(1)(c) based on this offered income. The CIT(A) upheld the penalty.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is sustainable when the notice under Section 274 fails to strike off the inapplicable limb of the charge.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Mr. Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. ACIT672 citing125 Taxmann.com 253 · 2021 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. Golden Peace Hotels and Resorts (P) Ltd.105 citing124 Taxmann.com 249 · 2021 · SC
- Pr.CIT v. Golden Peace Hotels and Resorts (P.) Ltd.32 citing124 Taxmann.com 248 · 2021 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘A’ PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1. Draft dictated on 10-01-2022 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 10-01-2022 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before JM the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026