DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SU-KAM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that due to the moratorium declared under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, continuation of pending suits is barred. Therefore, the appeals could not be proceeded with until the insolvency proceedings concluded.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was hearing cross-appeals by the assessee and the revenue for assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had ordered the liquidation of the corporate debtor, M/s Su Kam Power Systems Limited.
What were the issues?
Whether pending income tax appeals can continue when a company is undergoing liquidation proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and a moratorium has been declared.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘G’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA&
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The above cross appeals by the assessee in and the revenue in Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals]-XII, New Delhi dated 29.10.2010 pertaining to assessment year 2005-06. The revenue has also preferred an appeal in ITA No. 3794/DEL/2010 against the order of the CIT(A)-XII, New Delhi dated 15.03.2010 pertaining to A.Y 2006-07. Since all these appeals pertain to same assessee and were heard together, we are disposing them off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.
At the very outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee placed before us the order of the National Company Law Tribunal [NCLT], Principal Bench at New Delhi in C.A 569 [PB]/2019 in Company Petition No. [IB] 540[PB]/2017 dated 03.04.2019 u/s 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for liquidation of the corporate debtor M/s Su Kam Power Systems Limited.
We have given a thoughtful consideration to the orders of the authorities below and have perused the order of the NCLT for taking over the charge of the company. According to the provisions of section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, a Moratorium had been declared and continuation of any pending suit is barred and, therefore, till the Insolvency proceedings continues, these appeals cannot be proceeded with. Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid order of the NCLT, all these appeals are dismissed.
However, in the interest of justice, we give liberty to the assessee as well as the revenue to file application for revival of these appeals as and when the Moratorium period is over or the revival of the appeals. Meanwhile, all these appeals by the assessee as well as the revenue stand dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in and the appeals of the Revenue in 3794/DEL/2010 stand dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 05.08.2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026