SMT. MITALI SAMANTA L/H OF LATE PALASH SAMANTA,HOOGHLY vs. I.T.O.,WARD-23(3), HOOGHLY

PDF · subscribers
ITA 36/KOL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 February 2021AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek restoration if issues arise with the scheme's certificate.

What were the facts?

The assessee decided to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and filed the necessary declarations. However, the Designated Authority had not yet issued the certificate in Form No. 3.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘(A

Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, HON’BLE(KZ) & SHRI A.T. VARKEY, HON’BLE]

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH ‘(A)’, KOLKATA [BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT (KZ) & SHRI A.T. VARKEY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER] [THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT] Assessment Year: 2013-14 Smt. Mitali Samanta Legal Heirs of Lt. Palash Samanta.........................................Appellant C/o. Smt. Mitali Samanta, 9, G.T. Road, Srirampur, Hooghly – 712201. [PAN: AJUPS 9328 L] Vs ITO, Ward – 23(3), Hooghly...................………………………………………………............Respondent Appearances by: None appearing on behalf of the Assessee. Smt. Ranu Biswas, ACIT, Sr. DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : February 05, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : February 05, 2021 ORDER PER BENCH:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Kolkata dated 31.10.2019.

2.

In this case, the assessee submitted that she has decided to settle the dispute involved in the appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. She also stated that he has duly filed the declarations in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 but the Designated Authority has not issued the certificate in Form No. 3 as per Section 5(1) of the Scheme so far determining the tax payable by the assessee under the same Scheme.

Assessment Year: 2013-14 Smt. Mitali Samanta Legal Heirs of Lt. Palash Samanta 3. Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, we permit the assessee to withdraw this appeal and dismiss the appeal with the liberty to the assessee that in case, there is any problem in issuance of the certificate in Form No. 3 by the Designated Authority or any other such situation making the assessee not eligible to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, he will have the liberty to approach this Tribunal with a request for restoration of this appeal.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 5th February, 2021.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →