NAVAL KISHORE SETHI,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD.-25(1)., KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order of the CIT(A) and restored the appeal to the CIT(A)'s file. The CIT(A) was directed to pass a reasoned order after hearing the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte. The assessee claimed they did not receive the notice of hearing, preventing them from instructing their authorized representative to appear.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex parte order without ensuring proper service of notice to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C(SMC
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]
ORDER This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld.CIT(A)-7, Kolkata dated 16.09.2019 for AY 2015-16.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee Shri Manish Tiwari pointed out that the impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte order. According to the Ld. AR, the assessee did not receive the notice of hearing, so he could not instruct the Ld. AR to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) which resulted in the Ld. CIT(A) dismissing the appeal. According to Ld. AR, the Ld. CIT(A) ought not to have dismissed the appeal without hearing the assessee and should have adhered to the law prescribed u/s. 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). So, he prayed that the matter may be restored to the file of Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. DR did not oppose this plea of the assessee.
Having heard both the parties it is noted that the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte order and the assesee’s case is that since he did not receive the notice of hearing, he could not instruct the Ld. AR to appear before the Ld. CIT(A). Therefore, in the light of the aforesaid fact, I am inclined to set aside the order of Ld. CIT(A) and restore the appeal back to his file and direct him to pass a reasoned order as prescribed u/s. 250(6) of the Act after hearing the assessee and after going through the written submission and Naval Kishore Sethi, AY 2015-16 documents submitted by the assessee. Therefore, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 4. In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is pronounced in the open court on 10th February, 2021. Sd/- (Aby. T. Varkey) Judicial Member Dated : 10th February, 2021 JD(Sr.P.S.)
Copy of the order forwarded to:
Appellant – Shri Naval Kishore Sethi, 48, Janki Centre, 48, B. R. B. Basu Road, Kolkata-700 001. 2 Respondent – ITO, Wd-25(1), Kolkata. 3. CIT(A)-7, Kolkata (sent through e-mal) 4. CIT , Kolkata 5. DR, ITAT, Kolkata. (sent through e-mal)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026