ITO, WARD- 3(1), BULANDSHAHR vs. CANE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, BULANDSHAHR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CBDT circular No. 17/2019, dated 08.08.2019, sets a monetary limit for pending appeals. This circular was clarified to be applicable to all pending appeals.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was hearing multiple appeals filed by the revenue. These appeals were consolidated as the tax effect in each was below the monetary limit set by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for appeals was applicable to the pending cases before the tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
N/A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘F’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SH. PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER BENCH
The above captioned appeals by the revenue are taken up together as in all these appeals the tax effect is less than the monetary limit fixed by the CBDT in its circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019.
Vide letter dated 20.08.2019 addressed to all the Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax, the board has clarified that circular No.17/2019 is applicable to all pending appeals.
In the light of the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 all the above appeals by the revenue are dismissed.
In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 23.08.2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026