ITO (TDS) ALWAR, ALWAR vs. SHRI BABA MOHAN RAMJI KALIKHOLI WALAMILKPUR GURJAR, ALWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 194C was not attracted to the payments made to the trustees as 75% of the income collected from donation boxes was to be divided among the trustee families as per a court-approved scheme. Therefore, no addition could be made by the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, made payments to its trustees/members from donations collected. The Assessing Officer held the assessee liable for not deducting TDS under Section 194C on these payments. The CIT(A) had set aside these assessment orders.
What were the issues?
Whether payments made to trustees from donation box collections, as per a court-approved scheme, are liable for TDS under Section 194C. Whether the assessee is in default for non-deduction of TDS on such payments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Bharat Hotels Ltd.486 citing28 DTR 27 · 2019 · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sitaldas Tirathdas146 citing41 ITR 367 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- Dalmia Cement Ltd. v. CIT34 citing237 ITR 617 · 1999 · SC
- Sarala Devi (K.) (Smt.) v. Commissioner of Income-tax18 citing222 ITR 211 · HC
- CIT v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd.13 citing287 ITR 354 · 2006 · HC
- 201(14). CIT v. Rishikesh Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.12 citing253 ITR 310 · 2002 · HC
- Solar Automobile India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCTT5 citing64 DTR 34 · HC
- ICICI Securities Limited v. ITO (International Taxation)4 citing198 ITD 214 · 2023 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 739, 744 to 746/JPR/2025
Per Bench:
The above captioned four appeals are being disposed of by this common order, as the appeals involve common issues, and Ld. DR for the department and Ld. AR for the appellant have argued the appeals simultaneously.
By way of the four appeals, the assessee has challenged four separate orders passed by Learned CIT(A), whereby the appeals filed by Shri Baba Mohan Ramji Kalikholi Walamilkpur Gurjar, A
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194C
- Champion Omdev Construction Limited, Patna vs Asst Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 1…ITA 72/PAT/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Champion Omdev Construction Limited, Patna vs ACIT Circle 1, PatnaITA 155/PAT/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Champion Omdev Construction Limited…ITA 547/PAT/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Raj Construction, Vadodara vs The ITO, Ward TDS-2, VadodaraITA 327/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Subramanian Aravind, Tuticorin vs Ward 1, TuticorinITA 297/CHNY/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026