VENUGOPAL FOODS PVT.LTD,SATARA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SATARA CIRCLE, SATARA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 409/PUN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 February 2022AY 2008-093 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s order was ex-parte and the assessee's rights were not adjudicated. Therefore, the assessee was granted one final opportunity to present their case with documentary evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) resulted in an ex-parte order as the assessee did not appear. The CIT(A) passed the order based solely on the available documents.

What were the issues?

Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) without proper adjudication and opportunity to the assessee should be set aside and restored for fresh hearing.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa Khare
For Respondent: Shri S.P Walimbe

आदेश / ORDER

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 28-01-2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2008-09.

2.

At the outset, the ld. AR submitted that the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) is an ex-parte order. The ld. CIT(A) went on to pass an order based on the material available on record namely, statement of facts and grounds of appeal as per Form-35 while filing the appeal before the First Appellate Authority. The ld. AR prayed that one final opportunity may be provided to the assessee so that the matter may be discussed and represented on merits before the ld. CIT(A) and therefore, it should be restored to the file of ld. CIT(A).

3. On the other hand, the ld. DR submitted that once the appeal is decided as per materials available on record, there was no need for the assessee to again go back to the ld. CIT(A).

4.

We have perused the case record and heard the rival contentions and also have given thoughtful consideration to the order passed by the ld. CIT(A). We find that it is an ex-parte order where rights and liabilities of the assessee were not adjudicated upon. Since there was no appearance on record by the assessee and order of ld. CIT(A) was based only on materials available on records i.e. statement of facts, grounds of appeal filed by the assessee and the assessment order, the assessee should be given one final opportunity to defend his case through proper documentary evidences. In the interest of justice, we therefore, set aside the order of ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter back to his file for adjudication after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Thus, the impugned order is set aside. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of its claim. Therefore, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd February, 2022.

Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER ऩुणे / Pune; ददनाांक / Dated : 23rd February, 2022. रवि आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(A)-4, Pune 4. The Pr. CIT-3, Pune ववभागीय प्रतततनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, “बी” बेंच, 5. ऩुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गार्ड फ़ाइऱ / Guard File. 6. //सत्यावऩत प्रतत// True Copy// आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

िररष्ठ विजी सविि / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →