ICG-IISU ALUMNAE ASSOCIATION-BANDHAN,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the registration. It held that alumni associations can be considered for the benefit of the public at large and that the assessee's activities did not have a business/commercial nature. The Tribunal also found the activities to be genuine.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an alumni association, sought registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application, citing that the trust was for the benefit of its members, involved in business activities, and its activities were not genuine.
What were the issues?
Whether the alumni association's activities are for the benefit of the public at large, whether they involve business/commercial activities, and whether they are genuine for the purpose of registration under Section 12AA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- Road Transport Corporation (1986) 159 ITR 1 (SC), Thiagrajan Charities v. Addl. CIT27 citing178 ITR 359 · 1989 · HC
- Rajasthan Housing Board v. CIT13 citing21 Taxmann.com 77 · 2012 · ITAT
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Gandhinagar v. Gujarath Maritime Board6 citing123 Taxmann.com 35 · 2021 · HC
- CIT v. Indian Sugar Mills Association5 citing97 ITR 486 · 1974 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B JAIPUR
PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M.
The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of the ld. CIT(Exemption) dated 13-06-2024 passed u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 raising therein following grounds of appeal. ‘’1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the law the ld. CIT(E) has erred in not appropriately following the set aside directions give
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026