JAI MAA BHAGWATI FRUIT & VEGETABLE CO.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 36(2), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4984/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 August 2019AY 2015-163 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the case to the Assessing Officer for de novo assessment, allowing the assessee an opportunity to present documents and books of accounts after the partner dispute was settled.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a partnership firm, could not furnish required documents during assessment proceedings due to a dispute among partners. This led to a best judgment assessment under Section 144 and dismissal of their appeal by the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity for fresh assessment when inability to provide documents was due to internal partner disputes.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI O.P. KANT

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Jain, CA
For Respondent: Shri Raghu Nath, Sr. DR
Hearing: 29.08.2019Pronounced: 30.08.2019

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-12, New Delhi dated 14.12.2018 and pertains to AY 2015-16.

2.0 At the outset, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee is a partnership firm dealing in fruits and vegetables. It was further submitted that at the time of assessment proceedings, there was a dispute amongst the partners of the firm and, therefore, the relevant documents and details required by the Assessing Officer 1 ITA 4984/Del/2019 AY: 2015-16 could not be furnished. He submitted that since details could not be furnished, the Assessing Officer proceeded to form best judgment assessment u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act'). It was further submitted that subsequently, the assessee’s appeal before the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) was dismissed on the ground that the relevant details could not be furnished due to the dispute between the partners. It was submitted that this fact was duly brought to the notice of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) and the ld.CIT(A) had also noted the submission of the assessee in this regard in para 6.1 of the impugned order. It was further submitted that however, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) also dismissed the assessee’s appeal because the relevant details could not be filed.

The ld. AR prayed that now the dispute has been settled and if given an opportunity, the assessee will produce the required documents and books of accounts before the Assessing Officer. The ld. AR submitted that he undertakes to make due compliance before the lower authorities.

2.1 The ld. Sr. DR had no objection to the matter being restored to the file of the Assessing Officer.

ITA 4984/Del/2019 AY: 2015-16 2.2 Having heard both the parties and having perused the material on record, it is our considered opinion that in the interest of substantial justice, the case should be heard de novo by the Assessing Officer. Accordingly, we restore this file to the Assessing Officer with the direction to frame the fresh assessment order in accordance with law after giving due opportunity to the assessee to present its case. We also direct the assessee to present itself with a copy of the order of the Tribunal before the Assessing Officer on or before 31.10.2019 failing which the Assessing Officer shall be at liberty to proceed ex parte qua the assessee in accordance with law.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 30th August, 2019.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →