DCIT CIRCLE-9(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S ATLANTA LIMITED, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. This was due to the low tax effect, which was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT for filing appeals before the Tribunal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for assessment year 2014-15. The total tax effect involved in the appeal was Rs. 11,59,357/-.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect as per CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY
आदेश/ ORDER
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 16, Mumbai [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 28/02/2019 for the assessment year 2014-15.
Ms. Kavita P. Kaushik, representing the Department fairly admitted that the total tax effect involved in the present appeal is Rs.11,59,357/-. Hence, the appeal suffers from low tax effect in the light of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08-08-2019.
Undisputedly, the tax effect in the present appeal is less than the monetary limit prescribed by the Board for filing of appeals before the Tribunal by the Department. The CBDT vide circular dated 08-08-2019 (supra) has amended Para 3 of Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11-07-2018 thereby enhancing monetary limit of tax effect from Rs.20 Lakhs to Rs.50 Lakhs for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal. Thus, without going into merits of the issue raised in the appeal, the present appeal by the Revenue is dismissed on account of low tax effect.
Before parting, we clarify here that the Revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of appeal, with the requisite material to show that the appeal is protected by the exceptions prescribed in Para 10 of the Circular dated 11-07-2018 and its amendment dated 20/08/2018.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on Wednesday the 16th day of September, 2020.
Sd./- (VIKAS AWASTHY) �या�यक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER मुंबई/ Mumbai, �दनांक/Dated: 16/09/2020 Vm, Sr. PS(O/S)
��त�ल�प अ�े�षतCopy of the Order forwarded to :
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026