DCIT, CIRCLE- 12(1), NEW DELHI vs. INDIAN SUGAR EXIM CORPORATION LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4328/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 October 2019AY 2014-155 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal recalled its earlier orders, acknowledging a mistake in dismissing the appeals based on the Rs. 20 lacs threshold. Subsequently, considering the revised CBDT circular of Rs. 50 lacs, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals as not maintainable.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed Miscellaneous Applications requesting to recall ex-parte orders where their appeals were dismissed due to low tax effect. The Revenue contended that the tax effect was above Rs. 20 lacs, contrary to the Tribunal's finding.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue were maintainable considering the tax effect and the applicable CBDT circulars regarding monetary limits for appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Not Applicable

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘Friday/I-1’, NEW DELHI

Before: SH. R. K. PANDA & SH. K. NARASIMHA CHARY

For Appellant: Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Sr. DR
Hearing: 18.10.2019Pronounced: 18.10.2019

Heard together (8 matters)

M.A No.17/Del/2019
ITA No.1888/Del/2018
M.A No.95/Del/2019
ITA No.3635/Del/2017
M.A No.98/Del/2019
ITA No.4328/Del/2018
M.A No.100/Del/2019
ITA No.1091/Del/2017

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER BENCH:

1.

The Revenue through these Miscellaneous Applications requests the Tribunal to recall the exparte orders passed by it dismissing the appeals filedby the Revenue on account of low tax effect.

2.

Ld. DR, referring to the contents of the miscellaneous application, submitted that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the revenue is more than Rs. 20 lacs. The Tribunal, however, has dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue by relying on the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 on the ground that the tax effect involved in the appeal filed by the revenue is below Rs. 20 lacs. He accordingly submitted that a mistake has crept in the order of the Tribunal which requires rectification.

3.

Ld. Counsel for the assessees, on the other hand, conceded that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the revenue is above Rs.20 lacs and, therefore, a mistake has crept in the order of the Tribunal. They further submitted that in view of the recent CBDT circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 wherein the CBDT has raised the monetary limit to Rs.50 lacs for filing of the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal,the appeals of the Revenue are not maintainable and have to be dismissed.

4.

We have gone through the record in the light of the submissions made on either side. We find the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue in all these appeals is Rs. 20 lacs. Therefore, a mistake has crept in the order of the Tribunal by dismissing the appeal on account of low tax effect by relying on the CBDT circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018. We, therefore, recall the orders of the Tribunal and the miscellaneous applications filed by the revenue are allowed.

5.

The miscellaneous applications filed by the revenueare accordingly allowed. , 3635/Del/2017, 4328/Del/2018 & 1091/Del/2017 6. After hearing both the sides we find the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue in all these appeals is admittedly below Rs.50 lacs. The CBDT vide circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 has raised the monetary limit for filing of the appeals by the revenue before the Tribunal to Rs.50 lacs. Further the CBDT vide notification dated 20.08.2019 has held that the above circular is applicable even to pending appeals. Since the monetary limit involved in the grounds raised by the revenuein all these appeals is admittedly below Rs.50 lacs, therefore, in view of the CBDT circular and subsequent notification by CBDT (cited supra) the appeals filed by the Revenue are not maintainable. Accordingly, the same are dismissed.

7.

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 18.10.2019.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →