SHANKAR NARAYAN EDUCATION TRUST,THANE vs. ACIT, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The withdrawal is permitted with the liberty to revive the proceedings if the Vivad Se Vishwas certificate is not issued.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2013-14 to 2018-19. The assessee sought to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI S. S. GODARA & SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
PER BENCH : These are the appeals filed by the assessee directed against the separate orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 10, Pune common dated 09.09.2019 for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2018-19. 2. When the matter had come up for hearing today, the appellant filed a letter seeking permission to withdraw the above captioned appeals on the ground that the issues involved in these appeals stand settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. 3. On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of the appeals.
We are inclined to grant the permission to the appellant herein to withdraw the above captioned appeals with the liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal proceedings in the event of the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax declines to issue Form No.5 Certificate under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for whatsoever reasons. Accordingly, these appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, all the above six appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 30th day of May, 2022. (S. S. GODARA) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; "दनांक / Dated : 30th May, 2022. Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.
""यथ" / The Respondent.
The CIT(A)-10, Pune.
The CIT (TDS), Pune. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “B” ब"च, 5. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
More judgments on Section 5
- Sarmistha Dey, Hooghly, West Bengal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 24(1), Hoogly…ITA 2864/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Sarmistha Dey, Hooghly, West Bengal vs Income Tax Officer Ward 24(1), Hoogly…ITA 2863/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Jiban Kumar Saha, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2851/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Jiban Kumar Saha, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2850/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Subhasish Bhattacharya, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 52(1), KolkataITA 2849/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026