RAJESH KRISHNAKUMAR GOYAL,PUNE vs. DY. CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted the assessee's application for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the subsequent compliance. The Departmental Representative did not dispute these facts.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2015-16 was directed against an order involving proceedings under Section 271AAB. The assessee had opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH,
Before: SHRI R S SYAL & SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
ORDER
PER S.S.Godara, JM:
This Assessee’s appeal for the A.Y. 2015-16 is directed against the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-12, Pune’s order, dated 24.09.2019 passed in case no.PN/CIT(A)-12/10255/2017-18 involving proceedings u/s 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in short “the Act”.
This appeal came up for hearing today i.e. 31st May, 2022. None 2. appeared on behalf of the assessee. A perusal of records reveals that the assessee has submitted his application on 24.05.2022 to have opted for settlement under for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020 followed by his necessary compliance thereunder. He has also enclosed Form-5 issued by the designated authority vide Acknowledgment No.347198030030521 dated 03.05.2021 and requested permission for withdrawal of the present appeal.
A.Y. 2015-16 Rajesh Krishnakumar Goyal (A)
Learned Departmental Representative(DR) is fair enough in not disputing all these averments.
This Assessee’s appeal stands dismissed in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 31st May, 2022.
More judgments on Section 271AAB
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1564/KOL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse Shoe… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1559/KOL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1558/KOL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1557/KOL/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1556/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026