M/S MHETRE PACKAGING PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that Section 200A(1)(c), which allows for the levy of fee under Section 234E, was inserted w.e.f. 01-06-2015. Therefore, the levy is only applicable for defaults committed after this date.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the charging of interest under Section 234E for quarters 2 and 3 of FY 2012-13. The CIT(A) had upheld this levy.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under Section 234E can be levied for defaults committed prior to the amendment of Section 200A(1)(c) by the Finance Act, 2015.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. UOI614 citing440 ITR 26 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 10-12-2019 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-10 upholding the charging of interest u/s.234E in respect of Quarter Nos. 2 and 3 of the assessment year 2013-14. 2. Having heard the rival submissions and gone through the relevant material on record, it is observed that fees for default in furnishing the statements has been imposed on the assessee u/s.234E of the Act for the 2nd and 3rd quarters of the financial year 2012-13. Section 200A deals with processing of statements of tax deducted at source. Clause (c) of section 200A(1) was inserted by the Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01-06-2015 providing for the levy of fee u/s.234E of the Act. In that view of the matter, such fee u/s.234E can be levied only for the default committed after 01-06-2015 and not prior to that. The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in Olari Little Flower Kuries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and others (2022) 440 ITR 26 (Kerala) has affirmed the non- imposition of fee for the period prior to 01-06-2015. As the period covered in the appeals is of financial year 2012-13, we hold that the ld. CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the levy of fee u/s.234E of the Act. The impugned order is set-aside.
In the result, both the appeals are allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 07th June, 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 07th June, 2022 Satish
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to:
More judgments on Section 234E
- Mulchand Ramkishan Laddha, Pune vs Income Tax Officer (TDS-2), PuneITA 874/PUN/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2669/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2668/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2667/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Suyash Dhondu Paste, Ratnagiri vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, KolhapurITA 2666/PUN/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026