M/S MHETRE PACKAGING PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 198/PUN/2020Status: HeardITAT Pune07 June 20223 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal held that Section 200A(1)(c), which allows for the levy of fee under Section 234E, was inserted w.e.f. 01-06-2015. Therefore, the levy is only applicable for defaults committed after this date.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against the charging of interest under Section 234E for quarters 2 and 3 of FY 2012-13. The CIT(A) had upheld this levy.

What were the issues?

Whether interest under Section 234E can be levied for defaults committed prior to the amendment of Section 200A(1)(c) by the Finance Act, 2015.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 234E,Section 200A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Pratik B.Sandbhor
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani

आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the common order dated 10-12-2019 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-10 upholding the charging of interest u/s.234E in respect of Quarter Nos. 2 and 3 of the assessment year 2013-14. 2. Having heard the rival submissions and gone through the relevant material on record, it is observed that fees for default in furnishing the statements has been imposed on the assessee u/s.234E of the Act for the 2nd and 3rd quarters of the financial year 2012-13. Section 200A deals with processing of statements of tax deducted at source. Clause (c) of section 200A(1) was inserted by the Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01-06-2015 providing for the levy of fee u/s.234E of the Act. In that view of the matter, such fee u/s.234E can be levied only for the default committed after 01-06-2015 and not prior to that. The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in Olari Little Flower Kuries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and others (2022) 440 ITR 26 (Kerala) has affirmed the non- imposition of fee for the period prior to 01-06-2015. As the period covered in the appeals is of financial year 2012-13, we hold that the ld. CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the levy of fee u/s.234E of the Act. The impugned order is set-aside.

3.

In the result, both the appeals are allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 07th June, 2022.

1.

Sd/- Sd/- (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 07th June, 2022 Satish

आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to:

More judgments on Section 234E

All 4,792 judgments and leading authorities on Section 234E →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →