ITO, WARD-1(1), GUNTUR vs. KUNDURU RAMA DEVI, GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) has the discretion to provide an opportunity to the assessee to substantiate her case, and this power cannot be questioned. The Tribunal also found no violation of Rule 46A by the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2013-14. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue pertained to the CIT(A) providing an opportunity to the assessee and alleged violation of Rule 46A of the IT Rules.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in providing an opportunity to the assessee to substantiate her case and whether Rule 46A of the IT Rules was violated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Rule 46A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLESmt. Kunduru Rama Devi,
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Guntur, dated 08/01/2018 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Ground Nos. 1 & 5 are general in nature, no adjudication is required, therefore, same are dismissed.
Ground No.2 relates to ld. CIT(A) ought not to give opportunity to the assessee to substantiate her case.
We find that ld. CIT(A) has a discretion to provide an opportunity to the assessee to substantiate her case and (Smt. Kunduru Rama Devi)
therefore, the power of the ld. CIT(A) cannot be questioned. Thus, this ground of appeal raised by the Revenue is dis
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026