COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUS. LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court decided to dispose of these appeals based on a prior judgment in a connected matter. The outcome of the appeals is contingent on the decision in the referenced case.
What were the facts?
These appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax are disposed of in view of a separate judgment passed in a related case. The specific facts of these appeals are not detailed in this excerpt.
What were the issues?
The primary issue is the resolution of these appeals based on a precedent set in a related case, without detailing the specific legal points involved.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 56,57,105, 107,109,114,177/01, 88/02 111, 321,498/03,227,336,529,690/04,212/05 Page 1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RESERVED ON :11.10.2012
PRONOUNCED ON:31.10.2012
ITA 56/2001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUS. LTD ..... Respondent
ITA 57/2001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUS.LTD ..... Respondent
ITA 105/2001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 107/2001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 109/2001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 114/2001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 177/2001
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMET TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent
2012:DHC:6620-DB
ITA 56,57,105, 107,109,114,177/01, 88/02 111, 321,498/03,227,336,529,690/04,212/05 Page 2
ITA 88/2002
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 111/2003
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 321/2003
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 498/2003
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 227/2004
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 336/2004
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
M/S.ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 529/2004
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 690/2004
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent
2012:DHC:6620-DB
ITA 56,57,105, 107,109,114,177/01, 88/02 111, 321,498/03,227,336,529,690/04,212/05 Page 3
ITA 212/2005
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
versus
M/S. ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent
….Appellant Through : Sh. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advocate. ….Respondents Through : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Sh. Somnath Shukla, Advocates. Sh. Satyen Sethi and Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates.
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR
MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1. The present Appeals are disposed of in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA 18/1999 titled Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Ansal Housing Finance and Leasing Co. Ltd.
(S.RAVINDRA BHAT) JUDGE
(R.V. EASWAR) 31st October, 2012
JUDGE
2012:DHC:6620-DB
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026