DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI vs. HIMANSHU GUPTA, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CBDT had revised the monetary limit for filing appeals. Given that the tax effect in this case was low and below the revised limit, the appeal was deemed not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the order of the CIT(A) concerning assessment year 2015-16. The assessee's counsel argued that the amount involved was below the monetary limit for appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal considering the revised monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT and the low tax effect of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘A’: NEW DELHI
Before: MS. MADHUMITA ROY
PER AMITABH SHUKLA, AM,
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-25, New Delhi, [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)] dated 12.09.2025 arising out of assessment order dated 10.01.2024 passed under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The word ‘Act’ herein this order would mean Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. At the time of hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the amount involved in the present monetary limit is below the monetary limit i.e. Rs.94,795/-.
We find that CBDT vide Circular No.0
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026