GAURAV VERMA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-8, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval obtained under Section 153D was invalid as it was a common approval for multiple assessment years, granted mechanically without due application of mind. This vitiates the entire assessment.
What were the facts?
A search and seizure operation was conducted, leading to the discovery of diaries containing cash entries. The Assessing Officer added an amount based on these entries and framed assessment orders under Section 153C. The assessee appealed these orders.
What were the issues?
Whether the common approval under Section 153D for multiple assessment years is valid and whether the assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C is fundamentally flawed due to the invalid approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 153D,Section 132,Section 132(4),Section 69A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing163 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.500 citing163 Taxmann.com 118 · 2024 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman & Sh. Sudhir Kumar
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Sudhir Kumar, Judicial Member:
The instant batch of 03 appeals pertains to the single assessee herein namely, Gaurav Verma, against the separate orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-24, New Delhi pertaining to assessment years 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20 wherein, the assessee has raised various grounds of appeal. But, at the time of hearing, Ld. AR for the assessee has filed an Application for admission of common additional grounds of appeal in all the 03 appeals. Since common grounds/additional grounds have been raised in all these
appeals, hence, we are dealing with the facts of ITA No. 4454
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026